Mineva Lao Zabi (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
searchforpeace) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
savetheearth2013-04-30 09:06 am
searchforpeace) wrote in savetheearth2013-04-30 09:06 am
Video; Laptop
[After days and days of being shut in her room both prior to and following the snake statue incident, Audrey is finally done reading back through the network. Classes have naturally taken a chunk of that time, what with finals and the like, but her social life? Pretty much non-existent for a week or so.
What comes over the network now is video from her webcam. It shows Audrey sitting back in her desk chair with a heavy sigh and sitting down a pen with a distinctive clink to the side of her laptop. It appears to be afternoon dipping into dusk, the light spilling across the background of her room coming through window blind slats. Evidently her desk is set up against a window. To the left side of the screen is rows of black bookcases and to the right one can make out the barest edge of the foot end of a bed.
Her eyes, for the second, look off to the side of her laptop where she laid that pen. Her arms cross under her chest - she's dressed down to a plain shirt at the moment. There's a distinct frown settled on the young woman's lips, her brows furrowed. It's clear she's thinking on something, something to do with whatever is to the side of her laptop right then.
Finally, she speaks. At least she knows the webcam is on.]
There are a few things I'm not quite clear on, even after reading back through the network.
[Her brow furrows more there.]
And I don't think it's anything anyone can answer for me right now.
[She seems agitated and uncomfortable. She shifts in her seat, her expression darkens.]
In the rules of a debate, all parties must know the issue they are debating about. A debate can't even begin if that one issue isn't clear. Neither party can move forward, neither party can make arguments or reasonings without knowing what the issue being argued for or against is.
This isn't about police, the Thunder Corporation, snake statues or monsters or anything like that. We're lacking two very basic concepts in order to reach a fair conclusion and in order to have hopes of argument and logical reason.
Who and Why.
After seeing the statue and after the hunts, I can't believe this is simply the work of the police or the Thunder Corporation. So that means there must be another who, doesn't it? Perhaps several of them.
And why. We're all remembering things and feelings things that seem to make no sense so one might conclude it's all simply to awaken those things somehow. If that were the case though, this whole process would be more friendly than hostile, wouldn't it?
[That all said, Audrey is apparently done eyeing a stern hole into the side of her desk and with a big sigh uncrosses her arms and slowly melts into her seat.]
I've thought about all of this way too much.
What comes over the network now is video from her webcam. It shows Audrey sitting back in her desk chair with a heavy sigh and sitting down a pen with a distinctive clink to the side of her laptop. It appears to be afternoon dipping into dusk, the light spilling across the background of her room coming through window blind slats. Evidently her desk is set up against a window. To the left side of the screen is rows of black bookcases and to the right one can make out the barest edge of the foot end of a bed.
Her eyes, for the second, look off to the side of her laptop where she laid that pen. Her arms cross under her chest - she's dressed down to a plain shirt at the moment. There's a distinct frown settled on the young woman's lips, her brows furrowed. It's clear she's thinking on something, something to do with whatever is to the side of her laptop right then.
Finally, she speaks. At least she knows the webcam is on.]
There are a few things I'm not quite clear on, even after reading back through the network.
[Her brow furrows more there.]
And I don't think it's anything anyone can answer for me right now.
[She seems agitated and uncomfortable. She shifts in her seat, her expression darkens.]
In the rules of a debate, all parties must know the issue they are debating about. A debate can't even begin if that one issue isn't clear. Neither party can move forward, neither party can make arguments or reasonings without knowing what the issue being argued for or against is.
This isn't about police, the Thunder Corporation, snake statues or monsters or anything like that. We're lacking two very basic concepts in order to reach a fair conclusion and in order to have hopes of argument and logical reason.
Who and Why.
After seeing the statue and after the hunts, I can't believe this is simply the work of the police or the Thunder Corporation. So that means there must be another who, doesn't it? Perhaps several of them.
And why. We're all remembering things and feelings things that seem to make no sense so one might conclude it's all simply to awaken those things somehow. If that were the case though, this whole process would be more friendly than hostile, wouldn't it?
[That all said, Audrey is apparently done eyeing a stern hole into the side of her desk and with a big sigh uncrosses her arms and slowly melts into her seat.]
I've thought about all of this way too much.
[Video][Text]
I must have overlooked that then. My apologies, I'll go back and review later.
Then technically there must be three whos.
[Text]
And likely three groups. Those invading, those making way for them, and then whatever the heck is causing what's happening to us. Who knows how many people are involved?
[Video][Text]
Then we have to figure this out before the invasion. Or at the very least develop some idea of what we're up against.
[Text]
[Video] [Text]
[Text]
Kind of annoying, really. We don't even have any hints...
[Video][Text]
[She pauses in her typing there. She only vaguely knows this person, chiefly from network posts and the few times they've spoken. He seems level-headed though.]
This would be much simpler of course if we with access to this network could form some sort of collective group. Has this been tried yet, to your knowledge?
[Text]
[Video][Text]
[An invasion. Several sets of unknown enemies, specifically targeting those who've begun to 'remember'. And the act of 'remembrance' itself...]
[Text]
Not stopping you if you want to try. :)
[Video][Text]
I'm not really the "leader" type.
[Text]
[Video][Text]
[Text]