vanisland: (absolutely not)

[personal profile] vanisland 2013-10-23 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
No one is going to confess to that kind of thing, even if they had done it. Really, this seems more like a cover-up than anything else.
vanisland: (contest of strength)

[personal profile] vanisland 2013-10-23 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)
And what if whoever is responsible isn't numbered? He or she will never see this if that's the case, and then all you'd be doing is making us think one of us has screwed us over.
Edited 2013-10-23 21:30 (UTC)
vanisland: (pew)

[personal profile] vanisland 2013-10-23 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
As a matter of fact I do think there are such people. It's just that the pretense of looking for ecoterrorists based on a bombing attack is extremely flimsy.
vanisland: (Default)

[personal profile] vanisland 2013-10-24 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but why would an ecoterrorist destroy something with so little value?
vanisland: (first era style)

[personal profile] vanisland 2013-10-25 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
Good, we agree. Although I think what that company has planned for down the road just takes the "eco" out of it.
vanisland: (contest of strength)

[personal profile] vanisland 2013-11-06 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Too easy. Anyone that puts any real thought into it - you know, like us - is going to realize that's clearly not the case.

Of course, everyone other than us just stops thinking every so often, so it's actually going to work.